Forty years ago today, NASA’s human spaceflight program was struck by disaster as a spacecraft crashed contender The explosion occurred 73 seconds later, killing all seven people on board.
This tragedy almost ended the shuttle program quickly. Decades later, the mistakes that led to this contender The disaster, as well as the consequences of a similar loss of the shuttle in 2003 ColombiaLooking especially big now, as NASA looks to launch four astronauts on the ambitious Artemis II mission around the Moon early next week.
The mission will be the first crewed flight of the giant Space Launch System (SLS) rocket and Orion capsule, as well as the first time humans have left Earth’s orbit since the last Apollo mission in 1972. Already NASA has faced public scrutiny over its handling of unexpected behavior of Orion’s heat shield – a device critical to protecting astronauts when they return to Earth – during an unmanned orbital test flight in 2022.
On supporting science journalism
If you enjoyed this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism Subscribing By purchasing a subscription, you are helping ensure a future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.
NASA believes the change was made as a result of contender And other disasters in its history are enough to keep the Artemis crew safe. Tracy Dillinger, safety culture program manager in NASA’s Office of Safety and Mission Assurance, says, “Challenger … has brought to light aspects of the agency that hopefully did not exist and that we are always working toward addressing.” “Space is risky. We know that, and our astronauts know that. We just want to be smart about the risks we accept.” Currently, the Orion heat shield is widely considered to pose the greatest risk to the crew; NASA said the changes addressed concerns Artemis II flight path.
From routine to disaster
1986 contender The disaster occurred on the STS-51L mission, the 25th flight of NASA’s shuttle program, which was approaching its fifth anniversary. During the week-long mission, the crew had an eclectic agenda – observing Halley’s Comet and deploying both a communications satellite and an astronomical instrument into Earth orbit – but it was most notable for one of its crew, Christa McAuliffe.
McAuliffe taught in middle and high school and was selected to fly after a nationwide “Teacher in Space” competition. She planned to teach two lessons from the classroom, and her inclusion was part of a broader campaign by NASA to portray shuttle spaceflight as a normal, low-risk activity in which non-astronauts could participate.
“It’s kind of an all-purpose carry-all vehicle that the astronauts themselves often refer to as a space truck,” says Jennifer Levasseur, space historian and curator at the Smithsonian Institution’s National Air and Space Museum. “The space shuttle is intended to be very routine, it is intended to be routine, it is intended to be safe – so safe that the astronauts don’t even have to wear spacesuits.”
On that cool January morning, fueled by the excitement surrounding McAuliffe’s flight, approximately 2.5 million students across the country tuned in to watch the launch – only to watch the disaster unfold on live television. The so-called O-rings that joined the cylindrical sections of one of the shuttle’s solid rocket boosters failed in much colder launch conditions than they were designed for. More than a minute after ignition, the shuttle’s massive external fuel tank exploded due to a ruptured booster, sending the vehicle into pieces over the ocean and killing all seven astronauts.
engineering safety culture
Watching the world, NASA tried to figure out what went wrong and how to fix it – all the while leading into a deep debate: Was human spaceflight still worth the risk of catastrophic loss? Although NASA rejected calls to end the space shuttle program, it halted flights for nearly three years as it looked at the data. contender Disaster.
With diagrams, charts, and in-depth technical writing A report that spans over 200 pagesNASA officials reconstructed the failure – not including its 15 appendages. That document highlighted not only the thermal constraints of the O-rings, but also the design limitations inherent in the shuttle and the sociopolitical pressures surrounding the program that put those O-rings in place and led to the launch.
“It was very clear on several missions before STS-51L that there was a problem with the solid rocket booster sections and the way they were joined together,” says Levasseur. Some safety concerns were raised even before any of the shuttles flew. And on the morning of launch, when an engineer said he was concerned about the O-rings in wintry weather, program managers who wanted the agency to successfully fly the shuttle decided to let the launch go ahead anyway.
“Despite all this information, NASA kept moving forward,” says Levasseur. “Its management said, ‘We have a schedule.'” That “launch fever” or “go fever,” as well as repeated O-ring discrepancies that prompted managers to ignore them, emerged as the real downfall. contender. The extreme cold caused the O-rings to fail, but NASA’s culture was just as flawed and in need of urgent resetting than any other piece of shuttle hardware.
Small version of NASA contender The investigation is ongoing today, says Sandra Magnus, a part-time professor of the practice of engineering at the Georgia Institute of Technology and a former NASA astronaut who previously served on NASA’s Aerospace Safety Advisory Panel. “Whenever an accident occurs, whether it is a major accident contender Or something less life-threatening, NASA has a process to try to understand what happened and why it happened,” she says.
NASA’s Artemis II The rocket rolled onto the launch pad on January 17, 2026, in anticipation of launch the following month.
Artemis’s ambitions
Now NASA faces its first crewed trip beyond Earth’s orbit since 1972, and there have been several iterations of the agency’s safety screening procedures en route to launch to protect the four astronauts: NASA’s Reed Wiseman, Victor Glover and Christina Koch, and the Canadian Space Agency’s Jeremy Hansen. They will be the first humans to launch on the SLS megarocket and its Orion capsule, and if all goes smoothly, they will set a record for the farthest humans reach from Earth.
Some worry how they will fare during the return home, when their capsule must re-enter and traverse Earth’s dense atmosphere, engulfed in a prolonged, friction-ignited fireball for nail-chewing minutes. Of course, Orion is equipped with a heat shield — one that combines updates based on knowledge from both the Apollo and space shuttle programs, Levasseur notes.
While examining the Orion capsule scheduled to fly on the uncrewed Artemis I mission in 2022, NASA officials noticed that large sections of its heat shield had unexpectedly blown off. It’s an issue that engineers have been investigating in the years since the test flight, and they say adjusting Orion’s path toward Earth — falling rapidly through the atmosphere on a steeper slope rather than a shallower, more prolonged descent — should avoid the problem.
But this is not the same as redesigning the heat shield, and the agency chose not to test the heat shield on this new reentry profile before committing. Artemis IIAstronaut for this. NASA officials say redesigning the heat shield would have caused too many delays and a new re-entry test was considered too costly.
The Artemis I mission’s Orion heat shield seen after its 2022 unmanned test flight.
It would be difficult for an observer to determine whether that choice reflected launch fever breaking procedural norms once again. Artemis is a massive program — NASA estimated in 2024 that its cost from October 2011 would reach $93 billion by October 2025 — and that could naturally bring pressure to keep things running, says space historian Jordan Beam of the University of Chicago.
And there is a lot of pressure on NASA to work. “NASA has never come to a moment like this before,” says Bimm. Across the spaceflight horizon, the agency is negotiating multibillion-dollar contracts with commercial giants like SpaceX and Blue Origin, while competing with relative newcomers to spaceflight like China and India, which are pursuing their own crewed ambitions.
Experts say the agency set a promising example during the Artemis I mission, which faced repeated delays, including having to take the giant rocket off the launch pad to protect it from a storm.
To Levasseur, it suggests that the people leading NASA today will make tough choices to keep its employees safe. “These are people who were children or young people during the 1980s who were inspired by the early space shuttle flights,” she says. Shaped by seeing many people like him contender disaster in childhood or later Colombia Tragedy. “Those memories are there, and they won’t want to make the same mistakes that were made before.”
