A century of hair clippings shows lead exposure rates have declined

by
0 comments
A century of hair clippings shows lead exposure rates have declined

A century of hair clippings shows lead exposure rates have declined

There’s no safe level of lead exposure—but a small, strange study shows we’ve made incredible progress in recent decades.

A photo from the 1960s shows two women with bows in their hair, seen from behind.

Francis McLaughlin-Gill/Condé Nast via Getty Images

Your hair scientists can tell you a lot more than just whether your hair is having a good or bad day.

Ken Smith, a demographer at the University of Utah, says hair is “really a storehouse of information.” He should know—he’s among a team of scientists who analyzed chemicals found in hair samples collected over more than a century in research published Feb. 2. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA. Incredibly, Smith and his colleagues found that Exposure to lead – a dangerous heavy metal – has declined more than 100-fold since the 1960s.

Line chart shows the concentrations of lead in hair samples by time frame, starting with 1916 to 1959 and ending with 2020 to 2024.

On supporting science journalism

If you enjoyed this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism Subscribing By purchasing a subscription, you are helping ensure a future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The study is small and limited to the greater Salt Lake City area of ​​Utah. But it shows that physical mementos like a lock of hair hidden in a scrapbook for decades can reveal how our environment has changed over time.

Researchers collected 47 hair samples from 1916 to 2024 and called in Diego Fernandez, a geochemist at the University of Utah, to analyze the amount of lead in the hair. The analysis found no difference between the lead present in the cuticle like sheath that surrounds the hair and the lead found in the hair. The first may have originated from contaminated air, and the second may have originated from consumption of contaminated food or water.

The trend over time is surprising. The highest rates of lead were seen in samples from the 1960s, when lead was enriched approximately 120 times compared to 2020-2024 samples. But since the 1960s, lead exposure rates have declined steadily.

This decline coincided with the formation of the Environmental Protection Agency in 1970 and the passage of landmark legislation in the same decade, including the Clean Air Act and the Clean Water Act, although researchers also note that the Greater Salt Lake City area was home to two smelting facilities that closed during that period.

Still, the decline is astonishing. “I think it’s kind of a showstopper to show the power of environmental protection,” says Smith.

Katarzyna Kordas, an environmental epidemiologist at the University at Buffalo who was not involved in the new research, agrees. “Our belief is that we need larger studies to be able to show trends, and this study is indicating that we may still be seeing things that are remarkably pronounced in a small group of people.”

Cordas says most of the best research done on lead levels has used blood samples to measure exposure, and the studies date only to the latter decades of the 20th century. By tapping into the biological information stored in people’s memorable hair, Smith and his team were able to push back that timeline.

Although the study results indicate extraordinary success of the Clean Air and Clean Water Act, researchers warn that all the benefits of lead exposure could be reversed if pollution policies are changed. Cordas says lead exposure at any level is unsafe, with health consequences that include cognitive problems and learning difficulties in children and kidney and heart problems later in life. And even today some people in America remain naked.

“As a poison goes, lead is serious, and we should certainly be concerned and try to reduce population exposure,” says Cordes. “I don’t think we can let our guards down and say, ‘This is a settled issue.'”

It’s time to stand up for science

If you enjoyed this article, I would like to ask for your support. scientific American He has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most important moment in that two-century history.

i have been one scientific American I’ve been a member since I was 12, and it’s helped shape the way I see the world. Science Always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does the same for you.

if you agree scientific AmericanYou help ensure that our coverage focuses on meaningful research and discovery; We have the resources to report on decisions that put laboratories across America at risk; And that we support both emerging and working scientists at a time when the value of science is too often recognised.

In return, you get the news you need, Captivating podcasts, great infographics, Don’t miss the newsletter, be sure to watch the video, Challenging games, and the best writing and reporting from the world of science. you can even Gift a membership to someone.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you will support us in that mission.

Related Articles

Leave a Comment