Last week, a graduate student at the University of Alaska, Fairbanks was detained by police after tearing down pieces of AI-generated art hung in a student art exhibit and chewing on them in protest.
In form of school student newspaper Sun Star informedGraduate student Graham Granger was arrested for criminal mischief after chewing at least 57 of 160 images carefully arranged by fine arts student Nick Dwyer.
The incident was an eyebrow-raising illustration of collective exhaustion with being surrounded by generic AI output, a fierce debate that has gripped the art world. Some, like Dwyer, see it as a powerful tool for self-expression. Others, like Granger, argue that it is quite the opposite, diluting human authorship and taking away from artists who do use AI for their work.
Now, in one Interview with NationGranger, a film and performing arts major, talks about what inspired him to turn his teeth into a weapon against AI attack.
“It’s specifically a protest against the school’s AI policy and its performance art because I needed something that had a reaction to it,” he told the publication. “So it can reach more people.”
It is unclear which policy Granger was actually referring to. University of Alaska Academic Misconduct Policy It states that “work created by artificial intelligence engines falls under the Student Code of Conduct.”
The policy states, “Work submitted for credit created by the AI-Engine may be addressed using the academic misconduct portion of the Student Code of Conduct.”
However, whether art students are allowed or encouraged to use the technology is unclear.
Granger also revealed that her act was not premeditated, admitting that she “didn’t even know about the performance before that day.”
But once he saw Dwyer’s work, a series of AI-generated images that explore “AI psychosis” and the creation of false memories, he was struck by what he saw, especially when compared with other, non-AI art displayed in the exhibition.
Granger explained, “And then I saw the AI piece and it was just as an artist, it was insulting to see something of so little effort with all these beautiful pieces in the gallery.” Nation. “It shouldn’t be acceptable to put this ‘art’, if you will, next to these really great pieces.”
He argued, “It is art that is stripped of its own essence by not being created by the artist himself.”
“I think artificial intelligence is a very valuable tool,” Granger said. “I think it has no place in art. It takes away a lot of the human effort that goes into making art.”
Dwyer appears to have a very different take on the matter. His distorted performance was meant to explore his own struggles with “AI psychosis”, a term recently used by health professionals to describe the experience of people who experience delusional episodes after using AI tools like ChatGPT.
Before Granger chewed them out, the photos depicted Dwyer and her AI chatbot, with whom he says he has fallen in love.
The incident left a bad taste in Dwyer’s mouth when he – sorry – compared it in his comments Nation Slashing someone’s tires to protest the oil industry.
However, Dwyer has since decided to drop the allegations against Granger, admitting that he is trying to rely less on generative AI.
“I’m trying to distance myself from it,” he said. Nation.
More information on the event: Furious protestor tears AI-generated art off exhibition wall, chews it into tiny pieces using his teeth
